<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1212 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a detailed examination of the services provided to the cement manufacturer, emphasizing the necessity to align with the post-amendment input service definition. The decision underscored the importance of considering all pertinent evidence and legal precedents in assessing the eligibility of CENVAT credit for services essential to the manufacturing process, setting aside the initial order due to oversight of crucial documents by the Commissioner(Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1212 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a detailed examination of the services provided to the cement manufacturer, emphasizing the necessity to align with the post-amendment input service definition. The decision underscored the importance of considering all pertinent evidence and legal precedents in assessing the eligibility of CENVAT credit for services essential to the manufacturing process, setting aside the initial order due to oversight of crucial documents by the Commissioner(Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>