<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1606 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the assessment reopening. The Tribunal found issues with the confirmation of unverifiable purchases and a trading addition, ultimately concluding that the additions made by the authorities were unjustified and should be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2018 21:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1606 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the assessment reopening. The Tribunal found issues with the confirmation of unverifiable purchases and a trading addition, ultimately concluding that the additions made by the authorities were unjustified and should be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>