<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362357</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed. The CIT(A) correctly directed the AO to determine the property value under section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the CIT(A)&#039;s authority to instruct the AO for valuation and the AO&#039;s duty to offer the assessee the option for valuation by the Valuation Officer to ensure fairness and legal compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:35:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362357</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed. The CIT(A) correctly directed the AO to determine the property value under section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the CIT(A)&#039;s authority to instruct the AO for valuation and the AO&#039;s duty to offer the assessee the option for valuation by the Valuation Officer to ensure fairness and legal compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>