<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to estimate the profit element in alleged bogus purchases and dismissing the ground against the reopening of assessment. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing substantial evidence to substantiate transactions and the requirement to estimate profits in cases involving alleged bogus purchases, in line with established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to estimate the profit element in alleged bogus purchases and dismissing the ground against the reopening of assessment. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing substantial evidence to substantiate transactions and the requirement to estimate profits in cases involving alleged bogus purchases, in line with established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>