<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1164 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362337</link>
    <description>Post-clearance confiscation for alleged value misdeclaration is limited where imported goods have undergone final assessment and been cleared for home consumption, unless the statutory framework for duty short-levy or prohibited imports applies. Transaction value may be rejected only under the prescribed customs valuation process, with alternate valuation methods applied sequentially rather than through assumptions, incomplete comparisons, or speculative profit margins. Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration require a reliable evidentiary chain establishing the provenance and relevance of parallel transactions, test reports, and supporting documents. Unverified foreign dealings and inconsistent testing material do not, without sufficient foundational proof, support enhanced valuation, confiscation, or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1164 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362337</link>
      <description>Post-clearance confiscation for alleged value misdeclaration is limited where imported goods have undergone final assessment and been cleared for home consumption, unless the statutory framework for duty short-levy or prohibited imports applies. Transaction value may be rejected only under the prescribed customs valuation process, with alternate valuation methods applied sequentially rather than through assumptions, incomplete comparisons, or speculative profit margins. Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration require a reliable evidentiary chain establishing the provenance and relevance of parallel transactions, test reports, and supporting documents. Unverified foreign dealings and inconsistent testing material do not, without sufficient foundational proof, support enhanced valuation, confiscation, or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>