<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362324</link>
    <description>Proceedings initiated through a show cause notice issued to a deceased proprietor were held unsustainable because no valid action can be taken against a dead person and the deceased cannot be heard in defence, engaging natural justice; the challenge to the notice was therefore accepted. The Tribunal also held that its earlier order contained an apparent factual error by recording that death occurred during the appeal when the record showed death before issuance of the notice, making rectification permissible. On that basis, the appellant&#039;s rectification application was allowed and the Revenue&#039;s rectification request was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362324</link>
      <description>Proceedings initiated through a show cause notice issued to a deceased proprietor were held unsustainable because no valid action can be taken against a dead person and the deceased cannot be heard in defence, engaging natural justice; the challenge to the notice was therefore accepted. The Tribunal also held that its earlier order contained an apparent factual error by recording that death occurred during the appeal when the record showed death before issuance of the notice, making rectification permissible. On that basis, the appellant&#039;s rectification application was allowed and the Revenue&#039;s rectification request was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>