<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1150 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362323</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appellant eligible for the refund, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. The decision underscored the finality of the Commissioner (A)&#039;s findings and the application of res judicata principles in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1150 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362323</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appellant eligible for the refund, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. The decision underscored the finality of the Commissioner (A)&#039;s findings and the application of res judicata principles in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>