<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority after finding discrepancies in the computation of the demand for Service Tax. It was observed that the figures for Transport Service included amounts from units other than the Panoli Unit, leading to an erroneous calculation of liability. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s contentions and ordered a re-evaluation to determine the correct liability specifically for the Panoli Unit. The appeal was allowed for further consideration in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority after finding discrepancies in the computation of the demand for Service Tax. It was observed that the figures for Transport Service included amounts from units other than the Panoli Unit, leading to an erroneous calculation of liability. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s contentions and ordered a re-evaluation to determine the correct liability specifically for the Panoli Unit. The appeal was allowed for further consideration in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>