https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362317 The Tribunal held that the tinting activity by the appellant constituted manufacture under the Central Excise Act. The demand for the extended period and the penalty imposed on the appellant were deemed sustainable. However, the penalty on the Regional Manager was set aside due to the lack of technical knowledge of Central Excise provisions expected from marketing personnel. The appeals of Berger Paints India Ltd. were dismissed. en-us Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362317 The Tribunal held that the tinting activity by the appellant constituted manufacture under the Central Excise Act. The demand for the extended period and the penalty imposed on the appellant were deemed sustainable. However, the penalty on the Regional Manager was set aside due to the lack of technical knowledge of Central Excise provisions expected from marketing personnel. The appeals of Berger Paints India Ltd. were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362317