https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362304 The High Court remanded the appeal directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter, overturning the previous decision. The lower authority confirmed a demand under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, amounting to Rs. 58,333, with interest, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the original order, but the CESTAT remanded the case for reconsideration based on principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found the appellant had paid dues at a higher rate and took credit in their account, deeming the impugned order unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:31:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362304 The High Court remanded the appeal directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter, overturning the previous decision. The lower authority confirmed a demand under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, amounting to Rs. 58,333, with interest, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the original order, but the CESTAT remanded the case for reconsideration based on principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found the appellant had paid dues at a higher rate and took credit in their account, deeming the impugned order unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362304