<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273405</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that the write off of expenditure for an abandoned teleserial can be treated as a business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, following Circular No.16/2015. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the expenditure to be considered as revenue expenditure and in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273405</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that the write off of expenditure for an abandoned teleserial can be treated as a business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, following Circular No.16/2015. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, allowing the expenditure to be considered as revenue expenditure and in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>