<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273399</link>
    <description>The NCLT admitted the Company Petition filed by an Operational Creditor against a Corporate Debtor, initiating the insolvency resolution process. The dispute arose from the adjustment of part payments made by the Corporate Debtor against outstanding invoices, with the NCLT ruling in favor of the petitioner. The judgment emphasized relevant legal provisions, lack of explicit directions from the Corporate Debtor on payment adjustments, and the petitioner&#039;s evidence of default. The decision included directions for moratorium, appointment of an Insolvency Professional, and communication to both parties, ultimately leading to the resolution of the dispute through insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 21:46:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273399</link>
      <description>The NCLT admitted the Company Petition filed by an Operational Creditor against a Corporate Debtor, initiating the insolvency resolution process. The dispute arose from the adjustment of part payments made by the Corporate Debtor against outstanding invoices, with the NCLT ruling in favor of the petitioner. The judgment emphasized relevant legal provisions, lack of explicit directions from the Corporate Debtor on payment adjustments, and the petitioner&#039;s evidence of default. The decision included directions for moratorium, appointment of an Insolvency Professional, and communication to both parties, ultimately leading to the resolution of the dispute through insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>