<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 211 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13444</link>
    <description>The court held that expenses related to the guest house are not deductible under section 37(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Regarding interest income, the court ruled that interest from delayed customer payments and bill discounting qualifies for deduction under section 80HH, while interest from bank deposits and inter-corporate deposits does not. The court also allowed the set-off of interest payments against interest income. The appeal was partly allowed based on these conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 211 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13444</link>
      <description>The court held that expenses related to the guest house are not deductible under section 37(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Regarding interest income, the court ruled that interest from delayed customer payments and bill discounting qualifies for deduction under section 80HH, while interest from bank deposits and inter-corporate deposits does not. The court also allowed the set-off of interest payments against interest income. The appeal was partly allowed based on these conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>