<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1122 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlighted the familial nature of the transaction and the absence of tax evasion motives, aligning with previous rulings on transactions between spouses not intended for commercial purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1122 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and canceling the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlighted the familial nature of the transaction and the absence of tax evasion motives, aligning with previous rulings on transactions between spouses not intended for commercial purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>