<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1115 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362288</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the decision to treat the assessee as in default for non-deduction of tax at source from car running and maintenance expenses paid to employees for official duties. The failure to maintain requisite details led to the perquisite being taxable, justifying the default status. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeals, maintaining the orders passed under section 201(1)/201(1A) for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1115 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362288</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the decision to treat the assessee as in default for non-deduction of tax at source from car running and maintenance expenses paid to employees for official duties. The failure to maintain requisite details led to the perquisite being taxable, justifying the default status. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeals, maintaining the orders passed under section 201(1)/201(1A) for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>