<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO under Sections 36(1)(iii), 14A, and capitalization of interest expenses. The Tribunal cited relevant High Court judgments supporting the assessee&#039;s positions, emphasizing that the funds in question were part of regular business transactions and not subject to disallowance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletions of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO under Sections 36(1)(iii), 14A, and capitalization of interest expenses. The Tribunal cited relevant High Court judgments supporting the assessee&#039;s positions, emphasizing that the funds in question were part of regular business transactions and not subject to disallowance. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletions of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>