<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1106 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362279</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 144C by issuing a final assessment order instead of a draft assessment order. As a result, the final assessment order was deemed invalid, leading to its annulment. The ITAT did not delve into the Transfer Pricing adjustment due to the procedural irregularity. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the order pronounced on 20th June 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:01:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1106 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362279</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 144C by issuing a final assessment order instead of a draft assessment order. As a result, the final assessment order was deemed invalid, leading to its annulment. The ITAT did not delve into the Transfer Pricing adjustment due to the procedural irregularity. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the order pronounced on 20th June 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>