<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1104 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362277</link>
    <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 were treated as entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal followed the jurisdictional High Court in Chirakkal and held that the State statutory classification could not be displaced on the facts. It distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society Ltd. because that case involved nominal members treated as non-members and activities beyond the permissible co-operative framework, whereas the Kerala Act includes nominal members within the definition of member. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:29:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1104 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362277</link>
      <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 were treated as entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal followed the jurisdictional High Court in Chirakkal and held that the State statutory classification could not be displaced on the facts. It distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society Ltd. because that case involved nominal members treated as non-members and activities beyond the permissible co-operative framework, whereas the Kerala Act includes nominal members within the definition of member. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>