<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1097 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362270</link>
    <description>A co-operative society&#039;s entitlement to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(vi) depends on whether its bye-laws restrict voting rights as required by the proviso. Where an ineligible member, such as NLC, and its nominees have no voting rights in society elections, the Board manages day-to-day affairs, and the General Body retains ultimate control, mere membership does not disqualify the society. The fact that such membership is permitted under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, and that registration was not revoked for any violation, supported the deduction. On these facts, the society satisfied the statutory conditions and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1097 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362270</link>
      <description>A co-operative society&#039;s entitlement to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(vi) depends on whether its bye-laws restrict voting rights as required by the proviso. Where an ineligible member, such as NLC, and its nominees have no voting rights in society elections, the Board manages day-to-day affairs, and the General Body retains ultimate control, mere membership does not disqualify the society. The fact that such membership is permitted under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, and that registration was not revoked for any violation, supported the deduction. On these facts, the society satisfied the statutory conditions and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>