<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1095 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowance of management fees due to TDS defaults. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed for technical breaches in tax compliance, citing judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1095 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowance of management fees due to TDS defaults. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed for technical breaches in tax compliance, citing judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>