<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 164 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13438</link>
    <description>The proper application of section 164 and Explanation 1(ii) depended on whether the trust deed expressly stated and made ascertainable the individual shares of the persons for whose benefit the income was receivable. The Tribunal had focused on assignment of rights and general tax avoidance observations without first applying that statutory test to the deed. As that construction exercise was not properly undertaken, the Tribunal&#039;s order could not be sustained and the matter had to be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 164 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13438</link>
      <description>The proper application of section 164 and Explanation 1(ii) depended on whether the trust deed expressly stated and made ascertainable the individual shares of the persons for whose benefit the income was receivable. The Tribunal had focused on assignment of rights and general tax avoidance observations without first applying that statutory test to the deed. As that construction exercise was not properly undertaken, the Tribunal&#039;s order could not be sustained and the matter had to be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>