https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362260 The High Court upheld the lower courts' decision, dismissing the revisionist's appeal and confirming that the revisionist had violated Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court rejected the revisionist's claims regarding the purpose of the cheque, emphasizing the statutory presumptions in favor of the payee and the lack of evidence presented by the revisionist to rebut these presumptions. The court also deemed the date on the cheque as immaterial, as the revisionist admitted to issuing the cheque and the amount specified. en-us Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:04:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362260 The High Court upheld the lower courts' decision, dismissing the revisionist's appeal and confirming that the revisionist had violated Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court rejected the revisionist's claims regarding the purpose of the cheque, emphasizing the statutory presumptions in favor of the payee and the lack of evidence presented by the revisionist to rebut these presumptions. The court also deemed the date on the cheque as immaterial, as the revisionist admitted to issuing the cheque and the amount specified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362260