<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1086 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362259</link>
    <description>A summoned person may be accompanied by an advocate during investigation before the Director General under the Competition Act, 2002, because Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 extends to proceedings before a person legally authorised to record evidence. The Competition Act and the 2009 Regulations contain no express bar on counsel at the investigation stage, and the express recognition of legal representation before the Commission under Section 35 does not imply exclusion before the Director General. The investigating authority may regulate counsel&#039;s presence to prevent interference with the inquiry, but it cannot deny the right altogether.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:04:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1086 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362259</link>
      <description>A summoned person may be accompanied by an advocate during investigation before the Director General under the Competition Act, 2002, because Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 extends to proceedings before a person legally authorised to record evidence. The Competition Act and the 2009 Regulations contain no express bar on counsel at the investigation stage, and the express recognition of legal representation before the Commission under Section 35 does not imply exclusion before the Director General. The investigating authority may regulate counsel&#039;s presence to prevent interference with the inquiry, but it cannot deny the right altogether.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>