<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1082 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362255</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the entitlement to cenvat credit of service tax paid on retention money for construction services. The Tribunal held that since the service tax was paid on the retention money and the amount had been fully paid, the credit was admissible, citing a previous judgment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 07:01:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1082 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362255</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the entitlement to cenvat credit of service tax paid on retention money for construction services. The Tribunal held that since the service tax was paid on the retention money and the amount had been fully paid, the credit was admissible, citing a previous judgment. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>