<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1076 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, affirming the allowance of Cenvat Credit on Rent a Cab Service for the period April 2006 to December 2010. The judgment highlighted that services like Rent a Cab were not excluded as input services before 01.04.2011 and referenced the case of Wipro Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Pondicherry, to support this finding. The Tribunal concluded that denial of credit on the services in question was unjustified, citing precedents and legal analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1076 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, affirming the allowance of Cenvat Credit on Rent a Cab Service for the period April 2006 to December 2010. The judgment highlighted that services like Rent a Cab were not excluded as input services before 01.04.2011 and referenced the case of Wipro Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Pondicherry, to support this finding. The Tribunal concluded that denial of credit on the services in question was unjustified, citing precedents and legal analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>