<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1073 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Department incorrectly calculated excise duty by not including the sale proceeds of sprouts in the valuation. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and cancelling the demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1073 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Department incorrectly calculated excise duty by not including the sale proceeds of sprouts in the valuation. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and cancelling the demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>