<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1072 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of accurate information provision to authorities. The correct classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, was pivotal. As the issue primarily involved interpretation, the extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, and no penalty was imposed. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty set aside, emphasizing the significance of precise classification and the implications of invoking extended limitation periods in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1072 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of accurate information provision to authorities. The correct classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, was pivotal. As the issue primarily involved interpretation, the extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, and no penalty was imposed. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty set aside, emphasizing the significance of precise classification and the implications of invoking extended limitation periods in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>