<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1068 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362241</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for further verification to determine the validity of the CENVAT Credit claimed based on supplementary invoices. The appellant must provide records establishing receipt of services and payment of service provider bills for a fair assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear correlation between original service invoices and tax payment invoices to ensure credit approval is justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 06:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1068 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362241</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for further verification to determine the validity of the CENVAT Credit claimed based on supplementary invoices. The appellant must provide records establishing receipt of services and payment of service provider bills for a fair assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear correlation between original service invoices and tax payment invoices to ensure credit approval is justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>