<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Under Income Tax Act Section 271(1)(c) Not Justified Solely by Deemed Consideration in Property Sales.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40039</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to take stamp duty value of property u/s 50C being land and building for sale - From a clear distinction between sale consideration actually received and deemed to have been received in terms of subsection [1] of Section 50C application of subsection [1] of Section 50C therefore cannot automatically give rise to penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:24:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Under Income Tax Act Section 271(1)(c) Not Justified Solely by Deemed Consideration in Property Sales.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40039</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to take stamp duty value of property u/s 50C being land and building for sale - From a clear distinction between sale consideration actually received and deemed to have been received in terms of subsection [1] of Section 50C application of subsection [1] of Section 50C therefore cannot automatically give rise to penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:24:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>