<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1041 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362214</link>
    <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 were held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the jurisdictional High Court in Chirakkal applied to their status as such societies. The Tribunal distinguished Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. on facts, noting that it involved deposits from nominal members treated as non-members and activities found contrary to co-operative law, whereas nominal members are members in law under the Kerala Act. It also held that the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 did not displace the availability of section 80P relief on these facts, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:24:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1041 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362214</link>
      <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 were held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the jurisdictional High Court in Chirakkal applied to their status as such societies. The Tribunal distinguished Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. on facts, noting that it involved deposits from nominal members treated as non-members and activities found contrary to co-operative law, whereas nominal members are members in law under the Kerala Act. It also held that the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 did not displace the availability of section 80P relief on these facts, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>