<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1031 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362204</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, emphasizing genuineness and reasonable cause in loan transactions. The decision aligned with the High Court&#039;s emphasis on proving a reasonable cause to avoid penalties under the Income Tax Act. The judgments highlighted the significance of factual evidence and compliance with statutory obligations to avoid penalties, leading to the dismissal of penalties imposed under sections 271-D and 271-E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1031 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362204</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, emphasizing genuineness and reasonable cause in loan transactions. The decision aligned with the High Court&#039;s emphasis on proving a reasonable cause to avoid penalties under the Income Tax Act. The judgments highlighted the significance of factual evidence and compliance with statutory obligations to avoid penalties, leading to the dismissal of penalties imposed under sections 271-D and 271-E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>