<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1024 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of license suspension under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, citing the immediate action nature of suspension under regulation 19. Despite procedural deviations, the Tribunal found the overall timeline compliant and emphasized the licensing authority&#039;s discretion in suspending licenses. The lack of evidence challenging the suspension and the appellant&#039;s delayed response were deemed insufficient grounds for interference. The decision affirmed the authority&#039;s role in customs administration and highlighted the necessity of addressing allegations of involvement in smuggling activities. The appeal was dismissed on 05.06.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1024 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of license suspension under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, citing the immediate action nature of suspension under regulation 19. Despite procedural deviations, the Tribunal found the overall timeline compliant and emphasized the licensing authority&#039;s discretion in suspending licenses. The lack of evidence challenging the suspension and the appellant&#039;s delayed response were deemed insufficient grounds for interference. The decision affirmed the authority&#039;s role in customs administration and highlighted the necessity of addressing allegations of involvement in smuggling activities. The appeal was dismissed on 05.06.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>