<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 139 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13421</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reinitiate proceedings after the earlier reassessment order was set aside. The Court cited precedent and emphasized that reopening proceedings without new information following a final order is impermissible. The judgment favored the assessee, disposing of the reference in their favor and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 139 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13421</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reinitiate proceedings after the earlier reassessment order was set aside. The Court cited precedent and emphasized that reopening proceedings without new information following a final order is impermissible. The judgment favored the assessee, disposing of the reference in their favor and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>