https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362184 The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh order. The appellant's arguments regarding the nexus of input services with output services, filing refund claims on a six-monthly basis, non-debit of refund amounts in the Cenvat account, refund claims related to out-of-pocket expenses, invoices bearing different addresses, rejection of refund claims twice, arithmetic errors, incorrect computation formula, non-submission of supporting documents, and lack of reasoning for rejecting a specific refund claim were upheld. The lower authorities were directed to reevaluate and correct the errors in their decisions. en-us Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:22:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362184 The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh order. The appellant's arguments regarding the nexus of input services with output services, filing refund claims on a six-monthly basis, non-debit of refund amounts in the Cenvat account, refund claims related to out-of-pocket expenses, invoices bearing different addresses, rejection of refund claims twice, arithmetic errors, incorrect computation formula, non-submission of supporting documents, and lack of reasoning for rejecting a specific refund claim were upheld. The lower authorities were directed to reevaluate and correct the errors in their decisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362184