https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362167 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE to the appellant for using a third-party brand name, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the incorrect invocation of the extended limitation period for issuing the show cause notice. The Tribunal held that the demand against the appellant was time-barred, as they were entitled to the exemption during the relevant period as per the Board's Circular. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:21:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362167 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE to the appellant for using a third-party brand name, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the incorrect invocation of the extended limitation period for issuing the show cause notice. The Tribunal held that the demand against the appellant was time-barred, as they were entitled to the exemption during the relevant period as per the Board's Circular. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362167