https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362165 The Tribunal found that the demand of 10% equal to the value of exempted goods cleared by the appellants was not justified under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. As the appellants were maintaining separate records for inputs used in dutiable and exempted goods, Rule 6(3) was deemed inapplicable. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, if any. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362165 The Tribunal found that the demand of 10% equal to the value of exempted goods cleared by the appellants was not justified under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. As the appellants were maintaining separate records for inputs used in dutiable and exempted goods, Rule 6(3) was deemed inapplicable. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, if any. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362165