https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362163 The Tribunal condoned a 10-day delay in filing the supplementary appeal due to the timely filing of the main appeal. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing and trading, challenged the dismissal of appeals for non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the lower authority's findings, the Tribunal recognized the appellant's compliance with the pre-deposit obligations, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The case was remanded for the Commissioner to decide on the appeals' merits. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362163 The Tribunal condoned a 10-day delay in filing the supplementary appeal due to the timely filing of the main appeal. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing and trading, challenged the dismissal of appeals for non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the lower authority's findings, the Tribunal recognized the appellant's compliance with the pre-deposit obligations, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The case was remanded for the Commissioner to decide on the appeals' merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362163