https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362157 An apparent mistake in the preamble of an earlier CESTAT order, where the impugned order was described by the wrong reference number, was found to be rectifiable because the correct order reference was identifiable from the record. The Tribunal held that the error was a mistake in description rather than a substantive defect, and it corrected the record by substituting the proper order-in-original reference. The rectification application was therefore allowed. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:21:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362157 An apparent mistake in the preamble of an earlier CESTAT order, where the impugned order was described by the wrong reference number, was found to be rectifiable because the correct order reference was identifiable from the record. The Tribunal held that the error was a mistake in description rather than a substantive defect, and it corrected the record by substituting the proper order-in-original reference. The rectification application was therefore allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362157