<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 70 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13417</link>
    <description>HC analyzed penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) involving income concealment. The court found the assessee deliberately failed to disclose income in initial tax returns despite being an experienced taxpayer. Despite claiming reliance on a bank&#039;s preparation, the court determined the assessee&#039;s revisions and explanations were not credible. The HC upheld the penalty, emphasizing the taxpayer&#039;s obligation to provide accurate income information initially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 70 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13417</link>
      <description>HC analyzed penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) involving income concealment. The court found the assessee deliberately failed to disclose income in initial tax returns despite being an experienced taxpayer. Despite claiming reliance on a bank&#039;s preparation, the court determined the assessee&#039;s revisions and explanations were not credible. The HC upheld the penalty, emphasizing the taxpayer&#039;s obligation to provide accurate income information initially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>