https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362153 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the steel items were used for fabrication and support of capital goods as directed. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in disallowing the credit, misinterpreting the Tribunal's directive. The Tribunal held that the steel items were utilized for capital goods, making the credit admissible, and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:20:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362153 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the steel items were used for fabrication and support of capital goods as directed. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in disallowing the credit, misinterpreting the Tribunal's directive. The Tribunal held that the steel items were utilized for capital goods, making the credit admissible, and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362153