https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273367 The petitioner challenged the Commissioner of Customs' order for denying the right of cross-examination and contesting the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition and allowed the petitioner to reply. The writ petition is set for immediate hearing after the affidavit filing period, with a stay on penalty realization until a specified date or further orders, to prevent enforcement actions pending resolution of legal issues raised. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:00:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273367 The petitioner challenged the Commissioner of Customs' order for denying the right of cross-examination and contesting the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition and allowed the petitioner to reply. The writ petition is set for immediate hearing after the affidavit filing period, with a stay on penalty realization until a specified date or further orders, to prevent enforcement actions pending resolution of legal issues raised. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273367