<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 977 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273354</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the determination of fair market value for tenancy rights and the claim for expenses incurred on the new flat. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of builder charges in the cost of acquisition of the new flat.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 977 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273354</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the determination of fair market value for tenancy rights and the claim for expenses incurred on the new flat. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of builder charges in the cost of acquisition of the new flat.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>