<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362138</link>
    <description>Inspection, testing, analysis and certification receipts from services rendered largely outside India were not taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-United Kingdom DTAA because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill or know-how to the Indian recipients; mere performance of technical services was insufficient. The concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also deleted because the assessee had made a bona fide, debatable treaty claim and the record did not show false particulars or concealment. The receipts were therefore held not chargeable to tax in India and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362138</link>
      <description>Inspection, testing, analysis and certification receipts from services rendered largely outside India were not taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13(4)(c) of the India-United Kingdom DTAA because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill or know-how to the Indian recipients; mere performance of technical services was insufficient. The concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also deleted because the assessee had made a bona fide, debatable treaty claim and the record did not show false particulars or concealment. The receipts were therefore held not chargeable to tax in India and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>