https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362123 The Tribunal dismissed the company petition, upholding the impugned order dated 23.11.2017, as the appellant failed to prove allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The validity of the Board Meeting and Resolution dated 2.5.2013 was affirmed, with authority rightly transferred to Respondent No.2. Allegations of forgery, harassment, and denial of inspection were also rejected. The Tribunal found the appellant's conduct, including misappropriation of company assets, justified criminal proceedings. No costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:26:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362123 The Tribunal dismissed the company petition, upholding the impugned order dated 23.11.2017, as the appellant failed to prove allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The validity of the Board Meeting and Resolution dated 2.5.2013 was affirmed, with authority rightly transferred to Respondent No.2. Allegations of forgery, harassment, and denial of inspection were also rejected. The Tribunal found the appellant's conduct, including misappropriation of company assets, justified criminal proceedings. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362123