<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 941 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362114</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision modified the impugned order, reducing the redemption fine for one Bill of Entry and setting aside the penalty for another. The Tribunal considered specific import restrictions, licensing notes, and circulars by the DGFT, ultimately leading to a nuanced analysis of each instance of importation and confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:24:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 941 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362114</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision modified the impugned order, reducing the redemption fine for one Bill of Entry and setting aside the penalty for another. The Tribunal considered specific import restrictions, licensing notes, and circulars by the DGFT, ultimately leading to a nuanced analysis of each instance of importation and confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>