<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 925 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the construction of residential complexes conducted by the assessee constituted self-service and was not subject to service tax prior to 1.7.2010. The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 65(105)(zzzh) effective from 1.7.2010 could not be applied retrospectively to the assessee&#039;s case. As a result, the demand for service tax was deemed legally unfounded, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals and the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 925 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the construction of residential complexes conducted by the assessee constituted self-service and was not subject to service tax prior to 1.7.2010. The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 65(105)(zzzh) effective from 1.7.2010 could not be applied retrospectively to the assessee&#039;s case. As a result, the demand for service tax was deemed legally unfounded, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals and the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>