<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362097</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on outward transportation, affirmed penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act for non-payment of service tax, and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for waiver of penalty under Section 80. The appellant&#039;s arguments of bonafide belief and revenue neutrality were dismissed, with the tribunal emphasizing the appellant&#039;s awareness of service tax laws and failure to declare taxable value in returns. The penalties were upheld as the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable cause for non-payment, leading to the tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362097</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on outward transportation, affirmed penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act for non-payment of service tax, and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for waiver of penalty under Section 80. The appellant&#039;s arguments of bonafide belief and revenue neutrality were dismissed, with the tribunal emphasizing the appellant&#039;s awareness of service tax laws and failure to declare taxable value in returns. The penalties were upheld as the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable cause for non-payment, leading to the tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>