https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362094 Central excise demand was upheld where computer printouts, buyers' statements, part-period invoices, labour job invoices and the director's admissions collectively corroborated suppressed removals. The record showed duplicate documents and parallel challans/invoices prepared at the company's instance, while mismatches in invoice numbers, dates and balance-sheet figures further supported the allegation. The assessee's failure to produce sale bills, purchase bills, sales and purchase registers and cash book, despite claiming they existed, justified adverse inference. On that evidence, the duty demand, along with penalty and interest, was sustained. en-us Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:28:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362094 Central excise demand was upheld where computer printouts, buyers' statements, part-period invoices, labour job invoices and the director's admissions collectively corroborated suppressed removals. The record showed duplicate documents and parallel challans/invoices prepared at the company's instance, while mismatches in invoice numbers, dates and balance-sheet figures further supported the allegation. The assessee's failure to produce sale bills, purchase bills, sales and purchase registers and cash book, despite claiming they existed, justified adverse inference. On that evidence, the duty demand, along with penalty and interest, was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362094