<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 701 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273339</link>
    <description>A suit filed against the proprietor of a proprietary concern after the proprietor&#039;s death is against a non-existent person, so any decree obtained on that basis is a nullity. A proprietary concern is not a separate juristic entity, and Order XXX Rule 10 CPC applies only to the extent the nature of the case permits; it does not turn such a concern into a partnership firm or justify applying Order XXX Rule 4 CPC to a deceased proprietor. The decree could not therefore be executed, and the execution objection was correctly upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 701 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273339</link>
      <description>A suit filed against the proprietor of a proprietary concern after the proprietor&#039;s death is against a non-existent person, so any decree obtained on that basis is a nullity. A proprietary concern is not a separate juristic entity, and Order XXX Rule 10 CPC applies only to the extent the nature of the case permits; it does not turn such a concern into a partnership firm or justify applying Order XXX Rule 4 CPC to a deceased proprietor. The decree could not therefore be executed, and the execution objection was correctly upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>