<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim of long-term capital loss was bona fide and based on mandatory accounting principles. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed incorrect as the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim of long-term capital loss was bona fide and based on mandatory accounting principles. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed incorrect as the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>